All applications for research ethics approval must be reviewed and approved by the School's Human Ethics Advisory Group (HEAG) in the first instance. Depending on the nature of the research project and the type of application required for submission, some applications must also be considered by the University's Human Ethics Advisory Committee (HESC) before being granted final approval.
- Dr Simon Laham (Chair)
- Dr Jacqueline Anderson
- Associate Professor Brock Bastian
- Associate Professor Jennifer Boldero
- Dr Patrick Goodbourn
- Dr Isabel Krug
- Dr Audrey McKinlay
- Dr Adam Osth
- Marianela Delgado-Henriquez (Ethics Officer)
Contact the HEAG
The Application Process
Minimal Risk and Project-within-Program applications (and subsequent amendments) are reviewed and approved in-house by the HEAG and then forwarded to the HESC for noting. These application types may be submitted at any time. Data collection may commence as soon as HEAG approval has been granted.
Non-minimal risk studies, namely Individual Project and Program applications (and subsequent amendments), must first be approved by the HEAG and then forwarded to the HESC for further consideration and approval at one of the scheduled monthly meetings. Data collection may only commence after HESC approval has been granted.
All applications must be submitted in Themis via the Human Ethics Workbench of the Research Self Service module. 'Psychological Sciences' should be selected as the responsible HEAG. Before accessing the Workbench for the first time, researchers must first create a Themis password via the Themis accounts screen.
One complete copy of the ethics application or amendment, including all documentation and the Themis application summary, must also be sent electronically as a single PDF file to email@example.com for review.
Please do not send these documents to the email accounts of Piers Howe, Marianela Delgado-Henriquez or Marianne Lange as this may prevent them from being processed correctly. It is no longer necessary to cc Piers Howe on amendments.
HEAG submission deadlines
Most non-minimal risk applications will be need to also be reviewed by the Behavioural and Social Sciences HESC. The supervisor must therefore submit their ethics application sufficiently in advance of the submission deadline to ensure that the HEAG is afforded sufficient time to conduct its own review of the application.
2017 HEAG Submission Deadline
2017 HESC Submission Deadline
2017 HESC Meeting Date
|9th February||23rd February||10th March|
|9th March||23rd March||7th April|
|13th April||27th April||12th May|
|11th May||25th May||9th June|
|6th July||20th July||4th August|
|3rd August||17th August||1st September|
|7th September||21st September||6th October|
|5th October||19th October||3rd November|
|2nd November||16th November||1st December|
The HEAG is not able to guarantee that applications submitted after these deadlines will be processed and reviewed in time to meet the monthly Behavioural and Social Sciences HESC committee schedule.
In the event that the review committee requests changes be made to a document, it is the responsibility of the supervisor to action these changes and submit the amended documents to the School in sufficient time for them to be processed before the submission deadline.
In the rare case that an application needs to be reviewed by a different HESC, it is the responsibility of the supervisor to inform the School of this requirement as part of the initial submission and submit it to us at least two weeks before that HESC's deadline.
Is your application really minimal risk?
The criteria for minimal risk applications have become more stringent. Before submitting a minimal risk application, please complete the Human Ethics Minimal Risk Checklist
Current submission procedure
It is the supervisor's responsibility to ensure their students understand the ethics application procedure, including answering questions and providing any necessary training. It is also the responsibility of the supervisor to ensure that the application complies with the procedures outlined below. Applications that do not comply with these procedures will be returned without being assessed.
The School does not object to students writing applications or uploading them into Themis on behalf of the responsible researcher (i.e. the "supervisor"), but it must be the the supervisor who sends a copy of the ethics application PDF to the School. In addition, the School will only enter into correspondence about the status of an ethics application with the nominated supervisor. Should students have questions about their ethics application or the procedures below, they should contact their supervisor.
Templates and commonly used forms
The most common errors in ethics applications are related to the content and format of the Plan Language Statement and the Consent Form. The School has therefore provided the following templates and requires all researches to adopt them unless there is a valid reason for using an alternative document template.
Research Experience Program (REP)
The School has implemented Sona Systems for the Research Experience Program. This means that participants can sign-up for projects on-line and researchers can organise their data collection session on-line as well.